I've read through your posts with great interest, contemplating the emerging themes. I feel so interested and honored to be part of this learning community.
The issue of Violence has come up several times
as we’ve talked about possible themes on which to base curriculum. I think that we all agree
that violence in our communities is a major issue facing many students,
families, and teachers.
As a
dialogical educator, I find that the first formulations of a theme often aren't
sufficient to generate truly productive dialogue. Paulo Freire used the term "generative
themes" because in dialogical education teachers and students come
together to make something.
The theme
and resulting dialogue (often art making in our work) are generative because they make something and they make something
happen. Freire terms this making in
dialogue a "new naming." To name the world, to interpret and
understand it, is to change the world because we now see it differently and this
creates new possibilities for reflection and action.
A theme
exercise such as the one we did in the first and follow up Spaces of
Possibility workshop is a way to open an initial conversation, to signal to students
that you as a teacher are committed to creating spaces in which students’
ideas, interests and concerns are relevant and welcome. However, developing and
strengthening these spaces of possibility within the curriculum will take time.
Teachers and students can’t grant each other TRUST a priori. Trust in this work is built through
working together.
The
problem with focusing on violence or crime may
be that it doesn't necessarily create the possibility of a new naming of experience.
Teachers talked about reasons why talking about violence doesn't seem
possible--including that in places where violence is endemic, neither students
nor teachers can feel safe to have these discussions.
Art allows us to reframe experience in a way that supports conceptual, perceptual, emotional movement for makers, participants, and viewers.
Profound change begins with slight shifts, with altered reverberations, unsettling moments that become altered spaces for reflection and action.
In highly
emotionally charged situations, I believe that it is the work of the dialogical
artist educator to find a place and to initiate a practice/process that
generates fresh visualizations.
As I’m
writing this I am thinking of the challenge of visualizing “non violence,” too
often this is described only as an absence, of what is not happening, not what is or may come
into being.
A phrase
that keeps recurring in my mind is a Surrealist juxtaposition:
TOUGH
GENTLENESS.
Could an artistic investigation begin with creating a series of
such juxtapositions and then explore these new (perhaps quirky and sometimes
nonsensical) metaphors through various media?
What new
images of possibility might emerge?
Just
thinking….
This is a compelling post. You address some of the most difficult areas of teaching, including trust, and creating spaces for dialogue. I like the ideas of slight shifts, altered reverberations, etc. We are building something together within this community and it does take time to shift in practice but we cannot avoid what is difficult in the process of creating curriculum. I'm going to think about this post for a day or two because it invites many conversations. We are very fortunate to be working with you.
ReplyDelete