What are you afraid
to let go of?
Here are the responses to the final question we asked at our first workshop. We can tell that this is going to be an exciting and rewarding group of teachers to work with. Burn it Down!
- Stress, structure, expectations
- Can’t think of anything!
- My youth
- NOTHING. BURN IT DOWN.
- Comfort. Security. Easy.
- Control.
- IB Curriculum plans and requirements.
- I don’t know yet. A level of control with younger grades. BUT really I can let go of ANYTHING!
- My great projects that I love doing (not all but some). My independence (group work is hard but rewarding).
- The need for good products to “sell” myself as a teacher, art education as successful (based on the general ed. Teachers, kids, parents and admin expectations and definitions).
- Nothing! I am willing to let go of past comforts.
- Discipline in the classroom.
- I’m ready to get rid of all of it!
- Certain projects I love but can’t explain why they are valid. I have illustrated what already exists in my room (often)… Maybe how can I make these projects more open ended, contextual.
- Skills teaching and teaching Art History.
- Letting go of control… of my classroom!
- Just comfort of something different!
- Nothing.
- Not sure- I don’t think I am holding on to much regret now!
- What is comfortable and proven… taking chances and failing.
- Lessons that are easy to assess and show “data” – Even though we are evolving as art educators, we are being pressured more and more to show “data” and “evidence of learning.” I love the new approaches I’ve adopted and the students are being more reflective of their process, but creating ways to measure this practice is a tough task so I’m still embracing some of those old lessons that are easier to show date and all the other accountability admin wants.
- I actually like to reinvent and experiment, and always do a decent amount of PD and grant writing to build new worls/curriculum. I am a snake.
"I was touched, saddened, maddened and "get it" when I read the comment below:
ReplyDeleteLessons that are easy to assess and show “data” – Even though we are evolving as art educators, we are being pressured more and more to show “data” and “evidence of learning.” I love the new approaches I’ve adopted and the students are being more reflective of their process, but creating ways to measure this practice is a tough task so I’m still embracing some of those old lessons that are easier to show date and all the other accountability admin wants."
Let's remember that the use of the term "data" is a fad. If questioned even the most hardboiled administrator will explain that what s/he wants is clear evidence of learning that is summed up in numerical form.
A typical criteria for an "old school art style project" might state that "Shading creates a 3D form" or "Use elements and principles to create expressive meaning." One can write out a rubric--which mostly amounts to "doesn't, somewhat does-does well-does exceptionally" and then assign numbers to these categories. One is still making (professionally informed) subjective judgments and then correlating these with numbers. The weird illusion is that somehow we now have objective date.
Here's one criteria from the Model Cornerstone Assessment for Visual Arts High School Proficient : "Apply relevant criteria from traditional and contemporary cultural contexts to examine, reflect on, and plan revisions for works of art and design in progress."
As projects near completion teacher and students review the different sorts of criteria that seem to apply to a particular work: students then describe and analyze what this criteria suggests as a way to bring a work (their own and the work of others) to a higher level--what is good and meaningful about this work-in-progress? What might be done to make it even better? A teacher could then easily create a score for how well a student participated in this activity with regard to his/her own work and to the work of fellow students.
At first this may seem strange and complicated, but it's really a matter of habit, of making and re-using rubrics and forms, of educating students and admin about what we are assessing.
It's important to recognize that quality summative arts assessment of the future will summarize data gathered through in process formative assessments.
I don't think we can remain credible if the only evidence of learning we base our evaluations on are projects made in response to assigned art exercises.